The 108 reasons why dieting is so difficult: From genes to boredom, the factors that can keep you fat
23:07 GMT, 25 June 2012
I got 108 problems… Experts have enumerated the reasons why dieting is so difficult and found more than 100
No wonder losing weight is so difficult – 108 different factors are conspiring to keep us fat.
Experts say that everything from using a remote control to change TV channels to having the wrong sort of friends can push us to pile on the pounds.
Other things to be taken into account include our genes and the temptation to drive, rather than walk, short distances.
While some factors, such as our genes, can’t be altered, there are many small changes that can be made and which together can have a big impact on weight, says the British Nutrition Foundation.
The charity has used a list of 108 things affecting our weight, compiled for a Government report, as a starting point for its advice.
The ‘fat factors’ are divided into seven groups – social, psychological, eating and drinking, physical activity, our environment, physiology, and TV, computers and magazines.
Having the wrong sort of friends falls into the first category. While they may be good fun, they could also be encouraging us to eat the wrong things or tease us when we say we want to exercise or join a gym.
Snacking when bored and treating food as something to reward us when things go well both fall into the category of psychological pressures.
Gulping down food can mean we eat too much before the body’s satiety signals kick in, while using TV remote controls can make our lifestyle particularly sedentary.
The British Nutrition Foundation’s annual conference will today hear that our environment, from desk jobs to expensive gyms, is conspiring against us.
We are also bombarded by TV adverts for unhealthy foods and many of us don’t get enough sleep.
But there are many adjustments we can make to our lifestyles to improve our chances of shedding the pounds.
Social pressures: Fat friends may encourage you to eat the wrong things and or take the mickey out of your plans to exercise or join a gym
In its Small Changes: Big Gains guide, the British Nutrition Foundation makes suggestions such as getting up from the TV and doing some housework during advert breaks.
This could burn 40 calories per hour of TV viewing.
Hiding the remote control and changing channels manually would use up another 15 calories an hour.
Below are some key negative influences on would-be dieters:
SOCIAL: Peer pressure to eat badly; isolation; working long hours
PSYCHOLOGICAL: Stress and low self-esteem; snacking when bored; treating food as a reward
EATING AND DRINKING: Big portions; eating too quickly; impulse buying in supermarkets
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY: Travelling short distances by car instead of walking; using remote controls to change channels; playing indoors instead of outside
OUR ENVIRONMENT: Desk jobs; expensive gyms; reliance on labour-saving devices
PHYSIOLOGY: Not getting enough sleep; genes that make us crave fatty and sugary foods
TELEVISION, COMPUTERS and MAGAZINES: Being influenced by unrealistically thin role models; spending hours in front of a TV or computer screen; watching TV adverts for unhealthy foods
Measuring out small portions of crisps, instead of eating them straight from the bag, could save 130 calories, while office workers who get up to talk to a colleague or make a drink at least once an hour can burn off around 120 more calories a day.
Even fidgeting has its benefits, with someone who taps their feet while sitting burning up to 350 calories a day more than someone who stays completely still.
To put the figures in context, a glass of wine contains around 90 calories and a bar of chocolate around 180.
Senior nutrition scientist Bridget Benelam said: ‘There are lots of different options to choose from in terms of making changes in our behaviour that could have a positive impact on health.’ Miss Benelam said the key to losing weight could be to try to make at least one change within each of the seven groups.
She said: ‘Within each of these categories there are multiple influencers and we believe that by proactively selecting a range of these to focus attention on, people can make a series of small changes to their behaviour which, when combined, will have a larger overall effect.
‘For example, we believe that social engagement can have a positive impact on weight management for some people, as can developing cooking skills, keeping a food or activity diary, spending more time outside, and using the same weekly on-line grocery shopping list.’